![]() They are very much a leading edge development platform and some of the developments work their way into the "mainstream", but the focus seems to be on trying out new ideas rather than being a practical tool for most photographers. I don't use them regularly, but I do poke around them on occasion and unfortunately, they do little for the vast majority of the photographers out there. ![]() I try to stay reasonably up to date and tend to update them at least once or twice a year. Ted - I have Version 5.8 of RawTherapee and version 3.0.0 of Darktable running on my machine. Many RT functions are carried out in CIELAB space and many other RT functions offer a choice. Pardon my ignorance of all things Adobe - do third party processors support Smart Objects? I thought "Smart Objects" is an Adobe thing. What version? The latest is pretty good and even opens Foveon X3F files. If not, you will end up needing a second package as well, such as the GIMP. However, I don't know whether any of the free raw processors have that level of editing capabilities. ![]() I can now edit some of my photos entirely in Lightroom. Over time, many raw converters have been enhanced with additional editing capabilities, so in some cases, one can edit photos with only that one. Sometimes you can pass the file directly, while in other cases, you have to store it in another form, usually TIFF, and then open that in the second package. At the end of the raw conversion, you will often pass the file to a second software package that is capable of more substantial editing. These vary in terms of how much editing they let you do. The first is a raw converter that renders the raw file. In case this isn't clear from the thread, this often means two software packages. I am given to understand that one should always shoot in RAW and then use a good computer and good software to process the RAW files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |